I was just thinking...
I have been a failure as a blog writer. But that all changes TODAY. I have worked in to my class schedule two times a week for me to post to my blog. This will allow me and force me to write a post weekly in each of my blogs. (This one and my baseball blog, http://trotscap.blogspot.com/ ) My first blog post of the semester (and first since January) is my review of good friend Adam Linder's band Sister City's (http://sistercityband.com/) LP entitled Carbon Footprint.
Carbon Footprint was released in June 2011. Check it out and download here. I listened to it for what seemed like three straight weeks, not including breaks in which I pretended to be a productive member of society and worked at the Clark University Mail room and interned at the famous Worcester Magazine. So, it is only fitting that I would not get around to writing the review until the last day of August, the second day of the semester.
Let me start off with a little background on my connection with Adam Linder and Sister City. The first time I met Adam was my freshman year at Clark, at what is known as "Freud's Open Mic Night." (Sigmund Freud held a bunch of talks at Clark during his one trip to the United States. He must have loved it, because he never came back. Clark still is very proud of his visitation, and doesn't let you forget it.) I was a lowly freshman who didn't really know anyone, but I wanted to see some music played, see what the whole open mic scene was all about. I had sat by myself and quietly ate my food and watched the acts until Adam came up, with his omniscient acoustic guitar and began playing a few songs. I liked what he was playing, but they were all originals thus far, so I couldn't sing along or anything. Then, he started playing some Against Me! songs. If you know me at all, you know I am a) a huge sucker for anything acoustic (lyric cred: Brand New), b) I love Against Me! and c) Against Me!'s acoustic albums is one my favorite albums of all time. So, when "Those Anarcho-Punks Are Mysterious..." or whichever song it was, started playing, I was instantly hooked. This kid had the vocal range and talent to play songs that I knew and loved, and do it well.
Naturally, after the first night of hearing Adam play a bunch of great covers, I started listening to his original work. It turns out, all those musicians with the great, heartfelt lyricism for songs that I loved also had influenced Adam; we had similar tastes in music, and he, unlike me, could actually make some of that music! So, he had the genre down, and the musical ability. The last remaining part was the lyricism, and boy oh boy, is the man a poet!
I do not throw this kind of praise around regularly, so believe me when I say that Adam Linder writes the best lyrics out of anyone I have ever personally met. I know there are people out there who dislike his lyrics, call them depressing, etc. etc., but I find them to be perfect. There's an old saying, or something, that says that in order to be a real artist you need to suffer. While I don't think Adam has per se "suffered," I think he has pretty clearly dealt with difficult things, and he is able to real do justice to his feelings with his lyrics, which really are poetry. The struggles the Adam faces are real and relatable, especially for the now-college-age-but-formerly-angsty/punk-teen like me. I think that anyone that does not appreciate Adam's song writing talent has not tried hard enough.
Now, to the album itself. My first time listening to it I already knew I liked it. I'd never really heard Adam's electric stuff, at least not recorded, so this was a new angle to approach his music from. I immediately got the feel that this album remained true to Adam, and was influenced heavily by bands like Brand New, The Gaslight Anthem and Against Me! I even heard a little of the angrier Say Anything working it's way in (although I'm not sure how Adam will feel about that).
I will break down specific songs, one by one here. Each song is really it's own entity, so I think I wouldn't be doing the album justice if I didn't.
1. Hit Too Hard
The perfect opening to this album. This song's introduction really sets the tone, with the last lyric before the music comes in espousing that his "head was pounding for the human race."
The refrain of "and I drop to my knees" wonderfully shows the true feeling and passion behind the song, and the album as a whole. Adam wears his heart on his sleeve, and he wears it well. This song is, I believe the epitome of Sister City.
2. 20
This song I had heard a couple times before. This one is about growing up, and was written on Adam's 20th birthday. Vintage Adam/Sister City.
3. Some Prefer Nettles
I immediately get a Hot Water Music feeling from the opening of this song, but then it plunges right into being a distinctly Sister City song, with a nice blend of guitar progressions and great lyrics.
"There's a formula I follow...but you should stick like glue to what or who you know; BUT WHO AM I TO GIVE ADVICE?" begs the song.
4. Imperative
Emily Dickinson would have written this song, had she been a twenty-something punk/indie musician. And that is absolutely a compliment, Emily was one of the best poets of all time. She also spent almost no time outside of her own bedroom, a theme that this song explores (at least not going outside on one day).
5. Poland, 1945
This is one of my favorite songs on the album. This song explores the aspect of life of not living up to what your ancestors have done, and struggle I believe plagues many, many people. As the liner notes suggest, there's a lot of NOFX influence going on here, with the guitar parts and quick drums. If you're like me, you can relate to not wanting to wake up for an important day, although you need to; adapting to mainstream societal norms is a weird thing to deal with.
6. Going To Pinneburg
Oh hi there, band name meaning. Pinneburg, Germany is one of a few sister cities of Rockville, MD, Sister City's hometown. This song starts out slow and picks up almost (if not exactly) halfway through the song. The repetition of "One day I'll know what I don't" finishes of the song, which expounds upon the dualism of helplessness and hope for the future that seems to be Adam's mantra.
7. Ellis Island Blues
This may be my favorite song on the album. The exploration of the sad situation faced by those in Europe who faced persecution in one way or another and were given basically two options, stay, or get on some dirty, overcrowded boat to a (hopefully) better life for them and their offspring. Like "Poland, 1945," the song espouses that he feels that he is not doing justice to the struggles his ancestors faced for him to have the life he does. "If my great-great grandparents had only known/That their great-great grandson/Would end up turning people into stone."
8. Cartoon Movies
I honestly have no clue how to even begin to describe this song. Adam is Moses, the song is great. That's all I got for ya on this one.
9. Reinventing Adm Linder
The title of this song is obviously an homage to the best Against Me! album of all time, "Reinventing Axl Rose." There is also a song of the same name. So, this song directly connects my beginnings with Adam to him now. It's a freaking phenomenally written song, all the way around. This song is the quintessential Adam Linder, like the song's title kind of suggests. "If I may be so bold, to assume that I'll grow old." Oh, Sister City, you're so Sister City.
10. Eff That
This is the song that was written the longest time ago, and it is kind of noticeable. There is much more teenage angst in this song than some of the others. The quick drums and screaming parts speak to my more emo leanings, which I do enjoy returning to, from time to time. Good stuff.
11. Big And Small Words
"I start slow, but speed up as I go," one of the lyrics, does explain the song itself. This is a real quality jam that I find difficult not to bop my head to. That's right, bop.
12. How Much
Catharsis much? This Brand New-esque song is absolutely the best song this album could have ended on. In fact, I think each song was perfectly placed in it's spot on the album. "I want to know what I don't know" harks back to "Going To Pinneburg" and this song really does tie the album together. It's kind of an epic conclusion to a heartfelt battle of passionate feelings over forty-five minutes.
I really do appreciate this album and that is on a few levels: I like the genre; I love the lyrics; as a punk music fan, I think the vocals actually do work quite well with the music; I find it catchy and head bop-able; I also am a big fan of good poetry, which this album definitely is full of (12 poems, to be exact).
I highly recommend at the very least giving this album a listen through. More people than not would actually really like it and want a copy for themselves. If you value my opinion at all (which I assume you do, since you're reading), listen when I say: This is a high quality album with some great tunes.
Carbon Footprint definitely makes my list of Best Albums by Local/Underground/Indie artists.
Wednesday, August 31, 2011
Monday, January 24, 2011
More reasons I dislike the Tea Party
I was just thinking...
Since Barack Obama's election there has been a huge turnover in the dissent present in the United States. Of course, for eight years the democrats showed their dislike for the man in charge. Now, with the democratic president, it's the Right's turn to dissent. As mentioned in previous blog posts, this is realized mostly by the Tea Party, led by the former clown who became the guy that told you what to think, Glenn Beck and Mrs. Alaska herself, Sarah Palin. Political discourse has taken a new direction: Backwards.
Barack Obama: Not a socialist.
In the 1940's and 50's Senator Joe McCarthy led a witch hunt for communists in the United States. The US had just begun the Cold War with the Soviet Union, so fear of communism was in abundance. It has been said, by no one in particular, that the strongest tool to gain people's support is fear. McCarthy used fear to drive his ridiculous witch hunt, which left innumerable people without jobs and the ability to get a job, along with a couple casualties. The McCarthy Era was a dark time in US History.
Personally, I consider myself a Social Democrat. This, in the simplest terms, puts me one step away from being a socialist, and two(ish) steps from communism. So, I OBVIOUSLY do not fear communism. In fact, I strongly believe a certain amount of socialism is a MUCH better system then this capitalistic one, which has done a great job at making the United States full of obese Wal Mart shoppers and McDonald's patrons. Regardless, point is, socialism REALLY isn't something people should be fearing.
A main point of the Tea Party movement is the belief that Obama is a socialist. I'm here to tell you, right now, that Barack Obama is absolutely NOT a socialist. He is a democrat. The Tea Partiers seem to have missed the memo about the philosophies of the two major political parties in the US. Republicans favor small federal government, while Democrats are okay with the federal government. This means that a Democratic president should be expected to make government programs. When a Democratic president makes a new government program, this should not surprise people. This is to be expected, and has been happening literally for years. So, in accordance with this, when a Democratic president acts like, well, a Democrat, people should not be surprised. This fact was lost to the Tea Party.
ANY government program started since Obama has taken office is socialism, according to the Tea Party. ESPECIALLY "Obamacare," the health care bill he worked so hard to get passed that the new Congress is attempting to now repeal. Ignoring the fact that the Tea Party has also asserted Obama is a Nazi (mostly Glenn Beck here), a Muslim, an illegal immigrant, and communist (all of which are NOT true), they are two-faced.
The most supposed-socialist piece of legislation to have passed in recent memory is probably No Child Left Behind, a law that created federal regulations for academic assessment, in any effort to strengthen the nations' weak education ratings. This FEDERALLY funded law was the brainchild of George W. Bush, the very-much-Republican president who preceded Obama (and who I will be blogging about the memoirs of next weekend). When this bill passed there was no Republican bitching and moaning, and finger-pointing the socialist ideology behind the bill. If it had been proposed under Obama instead of W. Bush, we would never heard the end of it. The Tea Party would have called it Obama Youth. It would've been bad. But, if told a Tea Partier today that it was a socialist program, they would wholeheartedly agree and raise that it has been pretty much an utter failure. Yep. They're right. But, they've missed half the point. Socialist programs work off of government funds. Without adequate funds for the program, it will undoubtedly fail. Hence, NCLB. W. Bush made a socialist program that he intended to fund by cutting taxes, those little things that the government uses to pay for the maintenance of programs such as No Child Left Behind. EPIC FAIL.
While I am highly in favor of as much dissent as humanly possible, (because that's the way democracy works) I am strongly against the use of lies and fear as a means. I think it is silly to fear socialism, but that is mainly because I kind of am one. In the same strain, socialism has been given a negative connotation, which also upsets me. I really do wish Obama were a socialist, and that all of his programs/bills/what-have-you were socialist in nature. In actuality, he's pretty far from a socialist; (He just extended the Bush tax cuts, a very Republican thing to do.) If Obama were a socialist, and doing socialist presidential things, the Tea Party would AT LEAST not be lying in their assertion. The Tea Party's perception of what is socialist is pretty incorrect.
The Giffords Shooting
We've all heard about it by now; recently reelected Rep. Gabrielle Giffords was shot while holding her first "Congress on Your Corner" session, where she basically stood outside of gas station and talked with people. Jared Lee Loughner, the accused shooter who killed 6 people and injured up to 20 in the January 8th firing, was a member of the Tea Party. A high school drop out who withdrew from community college after inability to procure a mental health clearance, Loughner was clearly not a sane person. This, however, does not excuse Sarah Palin's map.
In response to Tea Party losses across the country, Sarah "I can see Russia from my house!" Palin's website, had a map up during the 2010 political campaigns with gun-scope markers showing candidates who had voted in favor of the health care bill. The point of the map was (supposedly) to show places where "change was needed," and the incumbents should be ousted in the election. Rep. Giffords was on of such. I understand the supposed point of the map, but some people don't. Some people are gun-toters. Some people are ardent in their political beliefs. Some people are not sane. These people may not "get" the map.
While it has not been legitimately connected to the shooting, I've got to believe that this map had something to do with it. Maybe it had nothing to do with it. But, regardless, it's quite the coincidence that a crazy person associated with a group that has cut the gas lines of candidates' brother's homes attempted to do what Sarah Palin's map seemed to suggest.
Tuesday, January 11, 2011
Winter Break 10-11: Almost Almost Famous
So, it's been a while since I've posted...my bad. One of my New Year's resolutions is to try to write a blog post at least once a week. I guess that means I've already broken it, because this is is now the SECOND week since New Year's Day, but I just came up with the resolution recently....ANYWHO.
So, a few months ago I was asked if I wanted to go on tour with Britney's Spear, a band formed at Clark (but well known throughout Worcester) consisting of my good friends Alan Grunberg, Tom Hamil, Zach Schnitzer, and Keegan Allen. I had offered up my mini van as the vehicle, as it would easily carry the equipment and prevented the need for a rental. I ended up not being able to use the van, with the tour being pretty extensive (down to New Orleans, at the furthest, but all down the eastern coast), so I was not part the tour. I still planned on seeing their tour kick-off show in Worcester, which was December, 30th.
The day of that show I got a text from Alan telling me that Tom was not going on tour, and that I could come along, if I helped out with the rental fee and gas. I of course jumped at opportunity, and began the efforts to convince my parents. It took some talking, but they eventually agreed. When I had originally planned on just going to that show that night, I'd made plans to take the van (me and my sister share it). This would not be possible now because we'd be leaving to go on tour from Worcester, and weren't going past Springfield, so I couldn't take the car and now needed a ride to Worcester. The 30th was also my dad's birthday, so I'd be missing his birthday dinner. I felt really bad about that, but I wasn't going to let this kind of journalistic experience pass me by!
Since I'd found out I would be going on tour everyone who I talked to about it related my plan to the Cameron Crowe film, Almost Famous. It was funny and it worked well with the situation. I was relishing the experience I would be having and distressed by the news that Tom wouldn't be doing the tour after the Worcester show as I hopped into the car to go to Worcester.
The show that night was at The Firehouse, a former firehouse now used as a house that regularly hosts concerts. I'd been there a good handful of times, but it is different every time, as each spread of bands boasts different fan bases and makes for differing show atmospheres. This particular show's atmosphere including lots of Boston area punks who had come in support of the bands from the area.
This show was one of the best in my recent memory. With one exception, all of the bands had high energy songs that had the dimly lit, unheated bottom floor of the Firehouse erupting into spurts of moshing, general rough housing and hooliganism. Unfortunately, Bovachevo, a hardcore Worcester band featuring my mail room boss, Liam, had to cancel their set, so I am still yet to see them live (I've heard their stuff before). Fortunately, Bovachevo were replaced by Antietam, another Worcester punk band I'd seen and liked before. Besides the cold freezing my toes into numbness, I had had a great time.
After the show, me and Britney's Spear went to a diner for some food. We ate, talked and joked around, generally enjoying ourselves.
We all knew it was coming, we all expected it. At a down part of our conversations, Tom told the other members of the band that when we leave here, we should all meet at someone's place to talk. About? Well, about Tom's announcement of a few days prior that he would not be going on tour with the band, as planned. This statement was pretty sobering; the band I'd seen the beginnings of, the rise to semi-fame of, and the beginning of a tour of, was headed towards an emotion-filled conversation about the future.
The conversation was just as I expected, Tom telling his reasonings, the others trying to find a way to change his mind. It was a very tense conversation, and an especially awkward one for me, as I was in the room, although I am not a member of the band. Ending on high nerves, the way things were was settled: Me and the remaining members of Britney's Spear, plus Sarah Bilotta, their manager who had booked the tour dates with Alan, would go on tour. Tom would stay up here, in Worcester, and at his home in Maine. Tom agreed to attempt to make it to the Brooklyn and Boston shows on the 11th and 12th.
I spent the night at Keegan's before our trip down to Johnston, RI to get the rental van. The plan was for me, Keegan, Alan and Zach to drive down to the rental place in Keegan's car, and then drive back to Worcester, returning Keegan's car before heading out on tour.
While on the border of Johnston and Providence, RI, we were heading down Killingly Street, a main road, listening to music and talking, having a general good time when a man's reluctance to pay attention cut everything short. The next intersection on the right was with the side street Myra, which would be a very sharp angle if you decided to turn down it. In addition to the sharp turn, the road had no stop sign. The man, driving a Ford Explorer, was coming from Myra, taking a left onto Killingly, which brought him across the front of our car as we proceeded down Killingly. By the time we'd realized what had happened, we were coughing out chemicals from the deployed air bags and clutching for the door handles to escape the vehicle.
The Explorer had foolishly pulled out in front of us to take his left turn, resulting in the car accident that crushed the front of Keegan's 1997 Honda Accord Wagon to the point of totaling it, and leaving only a minimal dent in the Explorer's driver-side back door. The accident was clearly the Explorer's driver's fault, but his car ended up on the good end of the accident.
Diagram of the accident.
I'll spare you the boring details of post-crash bureaucracy and get right to the meat of it; Keegan appeared to be at least slightly concussed (ringing in the ear, not hearing well, etc.), so I accompanied him for all the dealings with the collision center. It worked out that Keegan's insurance got him a rental car for from the accident to five business days after the damage is detailed by the insurance adjuster, so, we had a car.
At this point the tour was dead. It would have proven difficult to have a loud punk band with a bassist who can't hear/handle loud noise play a tour. I was incredibly disappointed to not be going on tour, as was Britney's Spear.
After getting the rental car we went to a Mexican restaurant located right next door. We had a conversation about how maybe we all died. When the waiter arrived, Keegan asked "Is this purgatory?" Our Latino server did not seem to understand the quip, and continued to take our order.
So, we returned to Worcester, where we would be celebrating New Year's Eve. The past few years I had gone to my friends the Ascioti's house for New Year's, and while I would miss the fun I always had there, I was ok with missing it for a tour. Luckily, there were a good number of friends who were also in Worcester, so I had a good time with our festivities, which included burning pieces of paper with things we wanted to leave behind in 2010 and firecrackers at midnight. Keegan spent the night in, resting, as would be assumed of someone recently concussed. I spent the night at his place, again.
The next morning my dad picked me up, and I returned home, incredibly disappointed and resigned to the fact that I would NOT be able to recreate/experience the story of Almost Famous myself. I felt really bad for Britney's Spear, who had taken time out of their schedules to plan the tour, and going on it would make things a bit more difficult to go abroad (Alan and Zach are spending the Spring semester abroad), but they'd made the risk, made the commitment, and now it would not be happening. We all felt generally defeated.
A week passed, and then the January 10th Brooklyn show was upon us. Honestly, I had forgotten about it until Keegan texted me asking if I wanted to come down with him. Naturally, I agreed. I had my brother, Noah, drive me to Sturbridge, where I met Keegan and Sarah. We headed down to Brooklyn, arriving at 3:30 for a 7 pm show. So, we had some time to kill. We went to a pizza place that Britney's Spear had gone to during their first show at this venue, which was in September. We sat, ate pizza, and conversed for a few hours, until Tom, his brother Will, and his father arrived, to our surprise, at the same pizza place.
Alan with Buddy the Party Xpo cat.
Photo: Sarah Bilotta
The show was great. The venue was great. It even had a cat, which seemed oddly ok with the loud music going on, but was not the biggest fan of Sarah's finger (he bit her). The venue, Party Xpo, was located in the Bushwick area Brooklyn, an area known recently for their large hipster population. Besides Britney's Spear and Respiratory Arrest (with members of Alan's previous band), the other bands on the bill were indie-ish, fitting well with Bushwick's hipster population. One of the bands, Athletics, was actually signed to a record label, Deep Elm, and their performance definitely proved why. Their bassist gave a nice compliment to Keegan after the show, saying something to extent of "I didn't really know what to expect from you (Britney's Spear) but I was happily surprised."
Britney's Spear playing at Party Xpo.
Left to right: Tom Hamil, Zach Schnitzer, Keegan Allen, Alan Grunberg.
Photo: Sarah Bilotta.
After Britney's Spear finished, Tom had to leave, to get back to his home in Maine that night (what a trip!). After the show, it was still up in the air whether they'd be playing the Boston (technically Allston) show the next day. There was threat of two feet of snow pelting the northeast beginning that day (1/11) and not ending until Thursday morning. The snow was not expected to impact the trip into Allston, but would almost definitely impact leaving. Zach could NOT be stuck there, as he needed to be home for his trip to Prague that night. Keegan's ears still weren't great, so another concert wasn't really a great idea for his health, either. However, the door was still left open to playing that one last show.
After getting to Worcester at around 3:30 am, I went to bed (at Keegan's, again). Tuesday morning I went the doctor's office with Keegan. While he had his ears checked, I called members of my family pleading for them to come out to Worcester to pick me up. Unfortunately, they were too busy, so I had to take the bus home. I also had to take the city bus home from the Springfield bus station, which is always a disgusting experience. I had nothing to do on the bus rides, so I spent the time looking out the window and thinking; it was nice to have an opportunity to think about think about all the experiences I'd had in the last week without all the normal distractions.
Before Keegan brought me to the bus station, Zach called, telling Keegan that he was not going to be able to make the Allston show, ending the tour. This was what I had expected since the night before, but this put finality on the tour. Britney's Spear's Southern Tour was officially over, after two shows, and one major car accident. It was possibly the end of Britney's Spear, as their future when Zach and Alan returned this summer is still very much ambiguous.
While the beginning of my 2011 was nothing like I'd expected it to be, I am absolutely grateful for the experience. I am a firm believer that people learn more from not-entirely-positive experiences than from wholly positive ones. While I didn't have the same amount of fun I probably would have had had we gone on tour, I was glad that everything had happened. I try to see the good in each experience I have, and there is definitely a lot I can take from these.
At the beginning of Winter Break, I had pretty much no plans. I'd taken things pretty easy and was doing nothing that good for the advancement of myself. Yea, I was on vacation, so that was fine, but I prefer to be doing things, having experiences I could reflect on later. Regardless of how far off from how things were expected to have happened this break's experiences were, I am proud to have been a part of them. What there was of the Britney's Spear tour was absolutely a life experience and one I will certainly never forget.
Friday, November 26, 2010
Deval Patrick and the Illegal Immigrants' Education
I was just thinking...
Alright, it's been a while since I've posted...I'm a bad blogger. At least when I over schedule myself for the semester.
Anywho.
I'm home in Springfield for Thanksgiving, and I'm sitting, eating lunch, reading the newspaper. I end up on the "Letters To The Editor" page. The first letter is by a Springfield woman, Carol Resnick, and is headlined "Illegal immigrants don't deserve break."
This letter was in regards to Massachusetts governor Deval Patrick, who was recently re-elected, for his second term in office. Almost immediately after the election, Governor Patrick proposed a plan that would allow Massachusetts residents, regardless of if they are here legally or not, to receive the in-state tuition break to state colleges (universities, technically, thanks to legislation from this past summer). MA residents pay something like $17,000/yr to attend UMass, while out of state students pay something around $21,000/yr. These numbers are estimates, but since my brother went to UMass, I've got a decent idea about the price.
The letter begins by stating "Illegal is ill." 'OH BOY' I sighed to myself upon reading this. The first paragraph ponders what Governor Patrick was thinking in this proposition while the second begins, "They shouldn't be entitled to any benefits." This ENTIRE paragraph is so ridiculous, I see it fit to include all of it, and will break apart everything that's wrong with it. And lemme tell you, it's all wrong.
Where do we go from here with our tax dollars?
Really? Ms. Resnick, you do not understand how these things work. No one's tax dollars are being paid towards an illegal immigrants' education! Tax dollars have literally NOTHING to do with receiving in-state tuition at UMass and other state schools. This rhetorical question obviously is hinting that tax dollars will next be used to do something EVEN WORSE than paying for an illegal immigrant to attend UMass (which is not what would be happening anyway!)
Allowing illegals to enter a university, taking the slot of some deserving citizen who was not accepted, is mind-boggling.
Carol, I'm sorry (actually, I'm not) but you've really got no concept of this system works. An illegal immigrant receiving in-state tuition does in no way, shape or form prevent a legal citizen from attending an institution. Also, if the citizen was deserving, THEY WOULD HAVE BEEN ACCEPTED! If they weren't accepted, they weren't deserving! If an illegal immigrant has been accepted to one of the fine public institutions Massachusetts offers, kudos to them. They've already accomplished a huge amount by succeeding academically in another country, which isn't the easiest thing to do. And Carol, "mind-boggling"? Really? It is mind-boggling how far you have misconstrued this system and situation.
In the final paragraph, Ms. Resnick goes on to say that citizenship is a privilege and honor etc. etc. Honestly, I don't care about citizenship. I don't believe that a student who may not be here legally should not be given the same right to in-state tuition as anyone who is here legally. If you've put in the work and been accepted to this school, there's no reason to say that you aren't "worthy" of in-state tuition, if you live in this state.
Resnick states that "when immigrants earn that right (citizenship) they are most welcome (to in-state tuition)." What? I don't understand how being a legal citizen makes you any more qualified to attend an institution that you've been accepted to. Yea, if you're a citizen, you pay taxes. But Republicans don't like taxes. They want tax cuts and would much prefer if there were no taxes, but still got the same services taxes provide for. So, really, they wish they could be like illegal immigrants! LIGHT BULB! The Republicans are jealous of illegal immigrants!
This issue has been somewhat under the radar, but I find it "mind-boggling" that these Republicans can be so ignorant about this subject, yet so fiery in their attacks on it.
Alright, it's been a while since I've posted...I'm a bad blogger. At least when I over schedule myself for the semester.
Anywho.
I'm home in Springfield for Thanksgiving, and I'm sitting, eating lunch, reading the newspaper. I end up on the "Letters To The Editor" page. The first letter is by a Springfield woman, Carol Resnick, and is headlined "Illegal immigrants don't deserve break."
This letter was in regards to Massachusetts governor Deval Patrick, who was recently re-elected, for his second term in office. Almost immediately after the election, Governor Patrick proposed a plan that would allow Massachusetts residents, regardless of if they are here legally or not, to receive the in-state tuition break to state colleges (universities, technically, thanks to legislation from this past summer). MA residents pay something like $17,000/yr to attend UMass, while out of state students pay something around $21,000/yr. These numbers are estimates, but since my brother went to UMass, I've got a decent idea about the price.
The letter begins by stating "Illegal is ill." 'OH BOY' I sighed to myself upon reading this. The first paragraph ponders what Governor Patrick was thinking in this proposition while the second begins, "They shouldn't be entitled to any benefits." This ENTIRE paragraph is so ridiculous, I see it fit to include all of it, and will break apart everything that's wrong with it. And lemme tell you, it's all wrong.
Where do we go from here with our tax dollars?
Really? Ms. Resnick, you do not understand how these things work. No one's tax dollars are being paid towards an illegal immigrants' education! Tax dollars have literally NOTHING to do with receiving in-state tuition at UMass and other state schools. This rhetorical question obviously is hinting that tax dollars will next be used to do something EVEN WORSE than paying for an illegal immigrant to attend UMass (which is not what would be happening anyway!)
Allowing illegals to enter a university, taking the slot of some deserving citizen who was not accepted, is mind-boggling.
Carol, I'm sorry (actually, I'm not) but you've really got no concept of this system works. An illegal immigrant receiving in-state tuition does in no way, shape or form prevent a legal citizen from attending an institution. Also, if the citizen was deserving, THEY WOULD HAVE BEEN ACCEPTED! If they weren't accepted, they weren't deserving! If an illegal immigrant has been accepted to one of the fine public institutions Massachusetts offers, kudos to them. They've already accomplished a huge amount by succeeding academically in another country, which isn't the easiest thing to do. And Carol, "mind-boggling"? Really? It is mind-boggling how far you have misconstrued this system and situation.
In the final paragraph, Ms. Resnick goes on to say that citizenship is a privilege and honor etc. etc. Honestly, I don't care about citizenship. I don't believe that a student who may not be here legally should not be given the same right to in-state tuition as anyone who is here legally. If you've put in the work and been accepted to this school, there's no reason to say that you aren't "worthy" of in-state tuition, if you live in this state.
Resnick states that "when immigrants earn that right (citizenship) they are most welcome (to in-state tuition)." What? I don't understand how being a legal citizen makes you any more qualified to attend an institution that you've been accepted to. Yea, if you're a citizen, you pay taxes. But Republicans don't like taxes. They want tax cuts and would much prefer if there were no taxes, but still got the same services taxes provide for. So, really, they wish they could be like illegal immigrants! LIGHT BULB! The Republicans are jealous of illegal immigrants!
This issue has been somewhat under the radar, but I find it "mind-boggling" that these Republicans can be so ignorant about this subject, yet so fiery in their attacks on it.
Tuesday, July 13, 2010
LeBron James and "The Summer Of Me"
I was just thinking...
Man, it's been a while since I've put up a new blog post. But today's the day! Lot's of things have happened in the last 3-4 weeks (obviously), but only one I have had thoughts enough to make a post on: LeBron James and his free agency.
While the summer of 2010 has been fittingly dubbed "The Summer of Me" by someone on bleacherreport.com, the beginning of this ridiculous amount of hype goes back much further than the end of the NBA Finals, further than when Lebron's Cavaliers were ousted by the Boston Celtics in conference semis, where there was a shot of Mr. James symbolically removing his Cleveland jersey in the tunnel leading to the locker room. Speculation began years ago, when teams like the New York Knicks began cutting payroll, drafting cheaper players, with the intent on signing Lebron or one of the many other big name free agents whose contracts would expire July 1, 2010.
From attending Yankee's games to hanging out with Jay-Z, it was thought for a while that LeBron would come to NY, or maybe even NJ, a team the Jay-Z is a partial owner of. Heck, he even came out with shoes that were blue and orange, the Knicks colors. But, this was seen as a possible coincidence, as many people can enjoy those colors without it predicting what team they will sign with in a year. The Cavs old jerseys used to feature those colors.
So, in years leading up to his impending free agency, there was already massive speculation as to LeBron's whereabouts in Fall 2010.
ESPN, who has some love for following the moves of the biggest names in sports as if we cared about when they took their dog for a walk (see: Brett Favre, Tiger Woods), continued their tradition of over analyzing and covering with this summer's free agency class, especially LeBron. Like Tiger and Favre, LeBron was given his own bar on the ESPN "BottomLine." There were hours upon hours of "analysts" digesting any possible scenario involving James.
But, obviously, it was not just ESPN that is at fault for making 2010 "The Summer Of Me." LeBron fanned his own flames. Prior to the July 1, he had made plans for a "free agent summit" with other big named free agents, including Dwayane Wade, A'mare Stoudamire and Chris Bosh. The meeting was planned so that they could figure out where each other were planning on going, so the others could make their plans based on that information. While I do not agree with such a meeting, it's fine. They can do what they want.
Fast forward to after July 1st. LeBron is officially a free agent. He has a few major teams vying for his services. The teams are the New York Knicks, the New Jersey Nets, the Chicago Bulls, the Miami Heat, and his hometown Cleveland Cavaliers.
I'll run down now why he should've signed with each team, and why he shouldn't have.
New York Knicks:
The Knicks had been preparing to sign LeBron for over two years. He was their Plan A to restart their once-storied franchise. He showed interest, and millions of people originally thought he'd be in New York by July 2. But, NY signed A'mare, who for some reason might not have worked ideally with LeBron. They're both personalities, what do you expect? The Knicks were poised to break the bank for the best player in the game to come to the biggest stage.
The problem with the Knicks was that besides location, they didn't really have anything LeBron wanted. He wanted to win, and if he couldn't do that in Cleveland, with a team built around him, how was he expecting to win in NY, with their best player, David Lee, expected to sign elsewhere. A'mare is a superstar, but just having two good players won't win you a championship.
It would have been nice to see LeBron as a Knick, reignite some rivalries, bring basketball back to New York, but in the end, it's not about that for LeBron. He wanted to win. Not in three years, not in five years, he wanted to win NOW.
New Jersey Nets:
New Jersey was a little different than NY, but not much. They have a good core of up and coming superstars in Devin Harris and Brook Lopez, but not much else. Yea, Jay-Z sorta owns the team, and him and LeBron are buddies, but, still, LeBron wants to win NOW.
Chicago Bulls:
This would've been the most interesting team to sign with. The Bulls have a great core group of guys, and really just needed an All-Star like LeBron to make them perennial conference leaders. They were already pretty much a playoff team, something that none of the other teams (minus the Cavs) could really say.
The issue with Chicago is MJ. LeBron, like anyone in the NBA today, grew up watching and respecting Michael Jordan. MJ will always be seen as a Bull, with all the championships he won with them in the 90's. LeBron supposedly has so much respect for Michael that LeBron has changed his number (which was 23, because of MJ) to 6. He encouraged other 23-wearers to do the same. Regardless how legit his respect is, if LeBron came to Chicago, he'd constantly be compared to Jordan, which is a hard DON'T agree that that should be a reason to not sign with someone, but hey, I'm not LeBron. I just don't understand it: If basically you're only concern is to win championships, why not sign with the team that during the early stages of the free agency period, had the absolute best chance out of all your suitors?
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Let me begin by saying I feel really bad for Cleveland. In general. Pre-LeBron, post-LeBron, whatever. The city's economy sucks, and it doesn't really have much going for it as far as tourism (The Rock 'n' Roll Hall Of Fame doesn't count!) Basically, their economy was based on LeBron James, and player the city had loved and respected for seven years. He had saved Cleveland, somewhat. But, time and time again, the Cavs were unable to win, LeBron's goal. But not without trying. They made it to Finals once, the conference finals in almost all of the last 4 seasons. They won the most games of any team during the 09-10 regular season. They were a great team. While I do not understand why they didn't win, and I do believe, had LeBron returned, they would have a good shot at winning, as they have the last 4 years. But, you can't ignore the facts: They DIDN'T win. LeBron had tried his luck with his hometown team, and it didn't work out.
I feel bad for the city of Cleveland because LeBron was too selfish to stay, but I can't say I really blame him for not wanting to be in Cleveland.
Check out these videos on Cleveland: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysmLA5TqbIY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZzgAjjuqZM
Miami Heat:
Before I get into the Heat, let me first off state that I AM a Celtics fan. We do have our own Big Three of superstars, so I don't really have a right to say that their Big Three is unfair. Yes, LeBron is better than Paul Pierce, Dwayane Wade is better all-around than Paul Pierce, and Chris Bosh has better knees than KG, but that's beyond the point. The point is that LeBron wanted to win, and joining a team with two other superstar free agents seems like a logical choice in order to do so. If I were in LeBron's situation, would I have done the same thing? Really, my answer is no (I would've gone with Chicago), but I do not disagree with his decision to go to South Beach. It's logical. If you want to win, you join the team with the best players (that is able to sign you).
The Magic's GM Otis Smith, who said that he thought LeBron was "more of a competitor" brings up an interesting point. But a wrong one. Yes, you'd expect someone with as much talent as LeBron to want a challenge, but, it was widely known that he wanted to win. He will be given such a chance with this Miami Heat team. They are by no means a complete team, right now, but they're getting there. They signed Haslem today. They'll have a good team, if not great, by the time the season starts. They'll be in the hunt for a conference championship. There's no question about that. And with LeBron, Wade, and Bosh's young age, they should be good for a very long time.
Does LeBron's decision upset me? It sure as hell does. That's just another team to compete with my Celtics! But it's business! Sports are now, more than ever, more business than anything else. It's sad, but that's the way it is.
I will not get too far into LeBron's television special, "The Decision," but I will say this to LeBron: It's sickening that you would buy an hour of television for yourself to have a press conference; I appreciate that the advertising money will be sent to charity; I think it's poor style that you told people they would know your decision by 9:10, and then proceeded to not say anything until 9:35; How egotistical must you be to call it "The Decision?"
And that is all I have to say about LeBron, until next summer when the C's take 'em down in the second round again.
And hey, check out my friend Max Benjamin's photography!
http://maxbenjamin.smugmug.com/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/murreasy/4778544942/
Man, it's been a while since I've put up a new blog post. But today's the day! Lot's of things have happened in the last 3-4 weeks (obviously), but only one I have had thoughts enough to make a post on: LeBron James and his free agency.
While the summer of 2010 has been fittingly dubbed "The Summer of Me" by someone on bleacherreport.com, the beginning of this ridiculous amount of hype goes back much further than the end of the NBA Finals, further than when Lebron's Cavaliers were ousted by the Boston Celtics in conference semis, where there was a shot of Mr. James symbolically removing his Cleveland jersey in the tunnel leading to the locker room. Speculation began years ago, when teams like the New York Knicks began cutting payroll, drafting cheaper players, with the intent on signing Lebron or one of the many other big name free agents whose contracts would expire July 1, 2010.
From attending Yankee's games to hanging out with Jay-Z, it was thought for a while that LeBron would come to NY, or maybe even NJ, a team the Jay-Z is a partial owner of. Heck, he even came out with shoes that were blue and orange, the Knicks colors. But, this was seen as a possible coincidence, as many people can enjoy those colors without it predicting what team they will sign with in a year. The Cavs old jerseys used to feature those colors.
So, in years leading up to his impending free agency, there was already massive speculation as to LeBron's whereabouts in Fall 2010.
ESPN, who has some love for following the moves of the biggest names in sports as if we cared about when they took their dog for a walk (see: Brett Favre, Tiger Woods), continued their tradition of over analyzing and covering with this summer's free agency class, especially LeBron. Like Tiger and Favre, LeBron was given his own bar on the ESPN "BottomLine." There were hours upon hours of "analysts" digesting any possible scenario involving James.
But, obviously, it was not just ESPN that is at fault for making 2010 "The Summer Of Me." LeBron fanned his own flames. Prior to the July 1, he had made plans for a "free agent summit" with other big named free agents, including Dwayane Wade, A'mare Stoudamire and Chris Bosh. The meeting was planned so that they could figure out where each other were planning on going, so the others could make their plans based on that information. While I do not agree with such a meeting, it's fine. They can do what they want.
Fast forward to after July 1st. LeBron is officially a free agent. He has a few major teams vying for his services. The teams are the New York Knicks, the New Jersey Nets, the Chicago Bulls, the Miami Heat, and his hometown Cleveland Cavaliers.
I'll run down now why he should've signed with each team, and why he shouldn't have.
New York Knicks:
The Knicks had been preparing to sign LeBron for over two years. He was their Plan A to restart their once-storied franchise. He showed interest, and millions of people originally thought he'd be in New York by July 2. But, NY signed A'mare, who for some reason might not have worked ideally with LeBron. They're both personalities, what do you expect? The Knicks were poised to break the bank for the best player in the game to come to the biggest stage.
The problem with the Knicks was that besides location, they didn't really have anything LeBron wanted. He wanted to win, and if he couldn't do that in Cleveland, with a team built around him, how was he expecting to win in NY, with their best player, David Lee, expected to sign elsewhere. A'mare is a superstar, but just having two good players won't win you a championship.
It would have been nice to see LeBron as a Knick, reignite some rivalries, bring basketball back to New York, but in the end, it's not about that for LeBron. He wanted to win. Not in three years, not in five years, he wanted to win NOW.
New Jersey Nets:
New Jersey was a little different than NY, but not much. They have a good core of up and coming superstars in Devin Harris and Brook Lopez, but not much else. Yea, Jay-Z sorta owns the team, and him and LeBron are buddies, but, still, LeBron wants to win NOW.
Chicago Bulls:
This would've been the most interesting team to sign with. The Bulls have a great core group of guys, and really just needed an All-Star like LeBron to make them perennial conference leaders. They were already pretty much a playoff team, something that none of the other teams (minus the Cavs) could really say.
The issue with Chicago is MJ. LeBron, like anyone in the NBA today, grew up watching and respecting Michael Jordan. MJ will always be seen as a Bull, with all the championships he won with them in the 90's. LeBron supposedly has so much respect for Michael that LeBron has changed his number (which was 23, because of MJ) to 6. He encouraged other 23-wearers to do the same. Regardless how legit his respect is, if LeBron came to Chicago, he'd constantly be compared to Jordan, which is a hard DON'T agree that that should be a reason to not sign with someone, but hey, I'm not LeBron. I just don't understand it: If basically you're only concern is to win championships, why not sign with the team that during the early stages of the free agency period, had the absolute best chance out of all your suitors?
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Let me begin by saying I feel really bad for Cleveland. In general. Pre-LeBron, post-LeBron, whatever. The city's economy sucks, and it doesn't really have much going for it as far as tourism (The Rock 'n' Roll Hall Of Fame doesn't count!) Basically, their economy was based on LeBron James, and player the city had loved and respected for seven years. He had saved Cleveland, somewhat. But, time and time again, the Cavs were unable to win, LeBron's goal. But not without trying. They made it to Finals once, the conference finals in almost all of the last 4 seasons. They won the most games of any team during the 09-10 regular season. They were a great team. While I do not understand why they didn't win, and I do believe, had LeBron returned, they would have a good shot at winning, as they have the last 4 years. But, you can't ignore the facts: They DIDN'T win. LeBron had tried his luck with his hometown team, and it didn't work out.
I feel bad for the city of Cleveland because LeBron was too selfish to stay, but I can't say I really blame him for not wanting to be in Cleveland.
Check out these videos on Cleveland: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysmLA5TqbIY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZzgAjjuqZM
Miami Heat:
Before I get into the Heat, let me first off state that I AM a Celtics fan. We do have our own Big Three of superstars, so I don't really have a right to say that their Big Three is unfair. Yes, LeBron is better than Paul Pierce, Dwayane Wade is better all-around than Paul Pierce, and Chris Bosh has better knees than KG, but that's beyond the point. The point is that LeBron wanted to win, and joining a team with two other superstar free agents seems like a logical choice in order to do so. If I were in LeBron's situation, would I have done the same thing? Really, my answer is no (I would've gone with Chicago), but I do not disagree with his decision to go to South Beach. It's logical. If you want to win, you join the team with the best players (that is able to sign you).
The Magic's GM Otis Smith, who said that he thought LeBron was "more of a competitor" brings up an interesting point. But a wrong one. Yes, you'd expect someone with as much talent as LeBron to want a challenge, but, it was widely known that he wanted to win. He will be given such a chance with this Miami Heat team. They are by no means a complete team, right now, but they're getting there. They signed Haslem today. They'll have a good team, if not great, by the time the season starts. They'll be in the hunt for a conference championship. There's no question about that. And with LeBron, Wade, and Bosh's young age, they should be good for a very long time.
Does LeBron's decision upset me? It sure as hell does. That's just another team to compete with my Celtics! But it's business! Sports are now, more than ever, more business than anything else. It's sad, but that's the way it is.
I will not get too far into LeBron's television special, "The Decision," but I will say this to LeBron: It's sickening that you would buy an hour of television for yourself to have a press conference; I appreciate that the advertising money will be sent to charity; I think it's poor style that you told people they would know your decision by 9:10, and then proceeded to not say anything until 9:35; How egotistical must you be to call it "The Decision?"
And that is all I have to say about LeBron, until next summer when the C's take 'em down in the second round again.
And hey, check out my friend Max Benjamin's photography!
http://maxbenjamin.smugmug.com/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/murreasy/4778544942/
Saturday, June 19, 2010
Refereeing Failure
I was just thinking...
"Find a rope, find a tree, let's haaang the referee."
This sentiment against refs has always been a common thought to have while playing and spectating sports. For the most part, it is usually not directed at officiating of major league sports, but occasionally it is. Until seemingly somewhat recently.
Really, there have been problems with officiating for as long as there has been sports officiating. But, in recent history it is taken a much more major part of the game. Over the past few years there have been many instances of alarm with the officiating of games, starting with:
The Tim Donaghy gambling scandal
The biggest result of his exposure was not that he had gambled on games he officiated, but that there is favoritism based on sales, by many refs. His tell-all book exposed many other NBA refs as favoring certain teams and players, changing the way the game is played, and even the outcome. Some excerpts from this book, which I highly recommend reading, can be found here: http://deadspin.com/5392067/excerpts-from-the-book-the-nba-doesnt-want-you-to-read
If you have ever watched an NBA game that has a superstar on the team, or a team the NBA wants to see win (i.e. the Lakers) because they will generate viewership, chances are you have seem some shady calls, and become slightly if not overly upset and frustrated with the refs. I know I have. It's despicable that the game is being changed for revenue's sake. That is not the way the game is supposed to be played, and it is unfair for the teams that aren't the ones the NBA wants to win, or don't have the superstar the NBA is selling.
Instant-replay for MLB
The possibility of instant-replay becoming part of baseball has been a major debate point for years, but finally came to some realization a few years ago, when instant-replay was added for questionable home run balls. This addition has been successful, but some fans still think there should be more instant-replay used, for instances like trapped balls, safe and out calls on the bases, etc. While I agree there could be more, I am content with the current usage.
Jim Joyce and the Armando Galarraga Perfect Game
Never have I ever seen anything like this before. A safe call on a clearly out throw, costing Armando Galarraga a perfect game. Jim Joyce is a great ump, and definitely one of, if not the best in the league. But he clearly got the call wrong in that Tigers-Indians game earlier this year. Instant-replay would have been extremely beneficial here. It's the way it is, though, and it's in the past, but I mean, Galarraga lost his chance at being in the history books because of a missed call by an ump.
The Koman Coulibaly Call
This is the event that spurred me to write this entry: In yesterday's (6/18) World Cup game between the US and Slovenia, there was possibly the worst call I have ever seen. (That, and the Jim Joyce "safe" call are definitely in the top 3) The US had been down 2-0, came back to tie it at 2, and with about 5 minutes left in the game, they had a corner kick. The bouncing kick from Landon Donovan ended up going off the well timed kick of Maurice Edu, scoring the winning goal. However, the goal was immediately waved off by ref Koman Coulibaly. The original sign was that it was offside. This turned out not to be the call, and it would've been an incorrect call, had that been the call. Coulibaly refused to give explanation as to what the call was on, but it was assumed to have been a foul call. Upon watching the play over and over again on television, it was determined by everyone in the world that any fould call that was made should have been against SLOVENIA, not the US. Slovenians physically held US players back, but Edu was able to cleanly escape and score. The call was incredibly wrong, and there was nothing done to deserve it. Even the unbiased English announcers said the call was ridiculously incorrect. While it yet remains to be seen the impact of this call on the US's future in the World Cup, it did severely impact the score of the game. The US won the game 3-2, but were only given a tie. If the United States does not make it to the round of 16 because they had two ties, but would've moved on had their Slovenia tie been called a win, (as it should have been) this botched call will go down in history as the worst call of all time. FIFA, the organization that runs the World Cup has spoken about removing Koman Coulibaly from any more World Cup matches, which I agree with, but it does not give the US the win they deserved.
While I appreciate the work that many referees and umpires do, there are too many instances that should not be left with them alone. We have all this technology, which would be beneficial for the games, if used.
"Find a rope, find a tree, let's haaang the referee."
This sentiment against refs has always been a common thought to have while playing and spectating sports. For the most part, it is usually not directed at officiating of major league sports, but occasionally it is. Until seemingly somewhat recently.
Really, there have been problems with officiating for as long as there has been sports officiating. But, in recent history it is taken a much more major part of the game. Over the past few years there have been many instances of alarm with the officiating of games, starting with:
The Tim Donaghy gambling scandal
The biggest result of his exposure was not that he had gambled on games he officiated, but that there is favoritism based on sales, by many refs. His tell-all book exposed many other NBA refs as favoring certain teams and players, changing the way the game is played, and even the outcome. Some excerpts from this book, which I highly recommend reading, can be found here: http://deadspin.com/5392067/excerpts-from-the-book-the-nba-doesnt-want-you-to-read
If you have ever watched an NBA game that has a superstar on the team, or a team the NBA wants to see win (i.e. the Lakers) because they will generate viewership, chances are you have seem some shady calls, and become slightly if not overly upset and frustrated with the refs. I know I have. It's despicable that the game is being changed for revenue's sake. That is not the way the game is supposed to be played, and it is unfair for the teams that aren't the ones the NBA wants to win, or don't have the superstar the NBA is selling.
Instant-replay for MLB
The possibility of instant-replay becoming part of baseball has been a major debate point for years, but finally came to some realization a few years ago, when instant-replay was added for questionable home run balls. This addition has been successful, but some fans still think there should be more instant-replay used, for instances like trapped balls, safe and out calls on the bases, etc. While I agree there could be more, I am content with the current usage.
Jim Joyce and the Armando Galarraga Perfect Game
Never have I ever seen anything like this before. A safe call on a clearly out throw, costing Armando Galarraga a perfect game. Jim Joyce is a great ump, and definitely one of, if not the best in the league. But he clearly got the call wrong in that Tigers-Indians game earlier this year. Instant-replay would have been extremely beneficial here. It's the way it is, though, and it's in the past, but I mean, Galarraga lost his chance at being in the history books because of a missed call by an ump.
The Koman Coulibaly Call
This is the event that spurred me to write this entry: In yesterday's (6/18) World Cup game between the US and Slovenia, there was possibly the worst call I have ever seen. (That, and the Jim Joyce "safe" call are definitely in the top 3) The US had been down 2-0, came back to tie it at 2, and with about 5 minutes left in the game, they had a corner kick. The bouncing kick from Landon Donovan ended up going off the well timed kick of Maurice Edu, scoring the winning goal. However, the goal was immediately waved off by ref Koman Coulibaly. The original sign was that it was offside. This turned out not to be the call, and it would've been an incorrect call, had that been the call. Coulibaly refused to give explanation as to what the call was on, but it was assumed to have been a foul call. Upon watching the play over and over again on television, it was determined by everyone in the world that any fould call that was made should have been against SLOVENIA, not the US. Slovenians physically held US players back, but Edu was able to cleanly escape and score. The call was incredibly wrong, and there was nothing done to deserve it. Even the unbiased English announcers said the call was ridiculously incorrect. While it yet remains to be seen the impact of this call on the US's future in the World Cup, it did severely impact the score of the game. The US won the game 3-2, but were only given a tie. If the United States does not make it to the round of 16 because they had two ties, but would've moved on had their Slovenia tie been called a win, (as it should have been) this botched call will go down in history as the worst call of all time. FIFA, the organization that runs the World Cup has spoken about removing Koman Coulibaly from any more World Cup matches, which I agree with, but it does not give the US the win they deserved.
While I appreciate the work that many referees and umpires do, there are too many instances that should not be left with them alone. We have all this technology, which would be beneficial for the games, if used.
Wednesday, June 16, 2010
The War In Afghanistan
I was just thinking...
Earlier this month the "war" in Afghanistan became the longest war in US history. While there is still some speculation that Vietnam was still technically longer, the point remains the same: We've been in Afghanistan for too long. We went into the country with the mission of stopping al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and Osama Bin Laden, in direct response to the attacks of September 11th, 2001. Of course, the US was successful in capturing/killing many al-Qaeda leaders, but the leaders have been replaced, and bin Laden still remains on the lam, or possibly dead. Meanwhile, the Taliban and al-Qaeda have moved on to other countries in the Middle East, mainly Pakistan, rendering the war unsuccessful. The plan was to establish democracy in Afghanistan, which is relatively true now, but they have a corrupt government, where elections are fixed. Technically, that should be none of the US's concern, but they remain the military force there, and are needed for the security of the turbulent nation. There is no end in sight, the US troop numbers are being increased, not decreased. The withdrawl plans seem like an "if" at this point. Like Vietnam, we have gotten ourselves into a war that was not winnable, and that would be difficult to leave.
It is sad, but most of my life as a knowledgeable member of a nation has been in a war time. I disagree with the pursuit of war, however I am realistic and understand that there is no negotiating with organizations like al-Qaeda, and that sometimes war is unavoidable, and not a one-sided decision to make.
I do support our troops, I do not support war. The war in Afghanistan needs to end. Wars need to end. Unfortunately, there are too many people in this world who cannot simply be talked out of violence, and that is how wars begin. I realize a world without war is a utopia, and unrealistic, but ending a conflict like Afghanistan shouldn't be too much to ask.
Afghanistan is a similar war to Vietnam, yet, it does not receive the same sort of strong feelings as Vietnam got. Protests and rallies against the war were daily occurrences in the 60's, but there is hardly anything now. Does nobody care?
The best way to support our troops is to bring them home.
Earlier this month the "war" in Afghanistan became the longest war in US history. While there is still some speculation that Vietnam was still technically longer, the point remains the same: We've been in Afghanistan for too long. We went into the country with the mission of stopping al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and Osama Bin Laden, in direct response to the attacks of September 11th, 2001. Of course, the US was successful in capturing/killing many al-Qaeda leaders, but the leaders have been replaced, and bin Laden still remains on the lam, or possibly dead. Meanwhile, the Taliban and al-Qaeda have moved on to other countries in the Middle East, mainly Pakistan, rendering the war unsuccessful. The plan was to establish democracy in Afghanistan, which is relatively true now, but they have a corrupt government, where elections are fixed. Technically, that should be none of the US's concern, but they remain the military force there, and are needed for the security of the turbulent nation. There is no end in sight, the US troop numbers are being increased, not decreased. The withdrawl plans seem like an "if" at this point. Like Vietnam, we have gotten ourselves into a war that was not winnable, and that would be difficult to leave.
It is sad, but most of my life as a knowledgeable member of a nation has been in a war time. I disagree with the pursuit of war, however I am realistic and understand that there is no negotiating with organizations like al-Qaeda, and that sometimes war is unavoidable, and not a one-sided decision to make.
I do support our troops, I do not support war. The war in Afghanistan needs to end. Wars need to end. Unfortunately, there are too many people in this world who cannot simply be talked out of violence, and that is how wars begin. I realize a world without war is a utopia, and unrealistic, but ending a conflict like Afghanistan shouldn't be too much to ask.
Afghanistan is a similar war to Vietnam, yet, it does not receive the same sort of strong feelings as Vietnam got. Protests and rallies against the war were daily occurrences in the 60's, but there is hardly anything now. Does nobody care?
The best way to support our troops is to bring them home.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
